Largest Cities in the U.S., 1910

By 1910, the national system of inland waterways that had linked together the cities in 1850 had been replaced by a nationally integrated system of railways and steel rails.

 
1. New York NY 4,766,883
2. Chicago IL 2,185,283
3. Philadelphia PA 1,549,008
4. Saint Louis MO 687,029
5. Boston MA 670,585
6. Cleveland OH 560,663
7. Baltimore MD 558,485
8. Pittsburgh PA 533,905
9. Detroit MI 465,766
10. Buffalo NY 423,715
11. San Francisco 416,912
12. Milwaukee WI 373,857
13. Cincinnati OH 363,591
14. New Orleans LA 339,075
15. Washington DC 331,069
16. Los Angeles CA 319,198
17. Minneapolis MN 301,408
18. Kansas City MO 248,381
19. Seattle WA 237,194
20. Indianapolis IN 233,650
21. Providence RI 224,326
22. Louisville KY 223,928
23. Rochester NY 218,149
24. Denver CO 213,381
25. Portland OR 207,214
26. Columbus OH 181,511
27. Toledo OH 168,497
28. Atlanta GA 154,839
29. Worcester MA 145,986
30. Syracuse NY 137,249
31. New Haven CT 133,605
32. Birmingham AL 132,685
33. Memphis TN 131,105
34. Scranton PA 129,867
35. Richmond VA 127,628
36. Omaha NE 124,096
37. Fall River MA 119,295
38. Dayton OH 116,577
39. Grand Rapids MI 112,571
40. Nashville TN 110,364
41. Lowell MA 106,294
42. Spokane WA 104,402
43. Bridgeport CT 102,054
44. Albany NY 100,253

 

Those cities that were well-connected to the national railway system tended to grow at the expense of those that were less accessible. New Orleans, for example, fell from #5 in 1850 to #14 in 1910. In the other direction, Chicago, with its extensive access to the Midwest via many railways, rose from #18 to #2.

The country was rapidly becoming more urban. Both the size of individual cities and the percentage of people living in urban places were rapidly on the rise.


Go Back to List

Go to SRU Main Page

Send Comments

Last Revised: October 11, 1996